I have to start off by saying that I deeply despise the political arena due to the incessant lying and threatening. I also despise it for their complete lack of scientific knowledge, but love of discussing it. Politicians are not scientists and they hardly ever listen or care to listen to what real scientists say. Anyway, the greater sage grouse, which lives in the plains of the West, is not being listed as an endangered species even though its numbers are very low. At least for now its not receiving protection.
However, this decision basically reverses a decision made by the We-Don’t-Really-Care-About-Nature Administration (aka. Bush Administration) in 2004 saying that the sage grouse does not need protection and that it’s numbers are fine. Well, information came out later about that decision saying that there was some tampering of the data. The reports said that the bird and especially its habitat were in danger and needed listing, but it came out that Julie MacDonald of the Interior Department intimidated scientists to overrule their data. This is how awesome and nature-caring our government is.
There is an issue with protecting the bird though and that issue (like always) is something to do with money and economics. Ken Salazar, Interior Secretary, wanted to find middle ground between protecting the species and its land and keeping the land open to landowners and industries. The Fish and Wildlife Service also said that the bird should be added to the list, but that other species might benefit more from the endangered species protection.
The greater sage grouse is now put as a candidate species for the list. It may possibly become listed as endangered or threatened at a later date.
The sage grouse has lost habitat in very similar ways to many other bird species. Development of residences and energy have created a much smaller habitat for the sage grouse, which is a ground bird. One-hundred years ago there were approximately 16 million sage grouse, but now there’s about 200,000 – 500,000.
Many people argue against putting the sage grouse on the endangered species list because it would prevent ranchers from using the land and energy development and exploration of the land. Representative Rob Bishop states that the government places more emphasis on environmental concerns than it does on job creation. He believes that putting the sage grouse on the list would be a direct attack on everybody who uses the land.
Overall, this just seems like a huge mess and the sage grouse, who really can’t speak for itself, will once again lose to the greed of this nation. I understand that people need jobs (I actually need a job soon), but I also understand that we can’t just overlook the species that are in trouble. We created their situation and we shouldn’t continue to exploit their land. There is a solution somewhere and it needs to come before more of the sage grouse’ land is disrupted.





